Ops
Performance Review Template
A founder-grade performance review that focuses on outcomes, growth, and the honest conversation managers usually avoid.
Last updated June 1, 2026
What it is
A one-page performance review document for early-stage startup teams. Replaces the 360-degree, multi-page, HR-driven document with something a founder can actually use: a structured conversation about outcomes delivered, growth needed, and what changes for the next 90 days. Used during 6-monthly or quarterly review cycles.
When to use it
Quarterly for direct reports until the team is 15+; semi-annually thereafter. Always: before any compensation conversation. Always: when there's a misalignment that 1:1s aren't fixing. Always: when promoting or letting someone go (the review history is the paper trail).
The template
# Performance Review — [Employee Name] **Manager:** [Name] **Period covered:** [Q1 / H1 / etc — DATE to DATE] **Review date:** [DATE] **Next review:** [DATE] --- ## 1. Outcomes vs commitments What was committed at the last review; what was delivered. | Commitment | Status | Outcome | |---|---|---| | [Outcome 1 from last review] | Met / Missed / Exceeded | [What actually happened, with numbers] | | [Outcome 2] | Met / Missed / Exceeded | [Actual] | | [Outcome 3] | Met / Missed / Exceeded | [Actual] | **Overall:** [Met / Mostly met / Below / Above expectations.] [One sentence summary.] ## 2. Strengths The 2-3 things this person did that nobody else on the team could have done. Specific. Not "great team player." - **[Strength 1]** — [Concrete example] - **[Strength 2]** — [Concrete example] - **[Strength 3]** — [Concrete example] ## 3. Growth areas The 1-2 things that, if improved, would unlock the next level. Honest. Not "could be more collaborative." - **[Growth area 1]** — [Why it matters, what specifically to work on, what success looks like] - **[Growth area 2]** — [Same] ## 4. The harder conversation The thing the manager has been avoiding bringing up. If there isn't one, this section reads: "Nothing significant to flag." If there is, write it directly. > "I've noticed [specific behavior] in [specific situations]. Here's the impact: [...]. Here's what I'd want different: [...]. What's making this hard from your side?" ## 5. Compensation / level [Stays / changes. If changes, specifics — new base, new equity refresh, new title.] [Rationale tied to outcomes + growth, not to time-served.] ## 6. Commitments for the next period 3-5 outcomes for the next quarter or half. Specific. Measurable. Owned by this person. - [ ] [Outcome 1 — measurable by DATE] - [ ] [Outcome 2 — measurable] - [ ] [Outcome 3 — measurable] - [ ] [Outcome 4 — measurable] ## 7. Manager commitments What I, the manager, am committing to do differently / better to support this person. - [Specific commitment 1] - [Specific commitment 2] ## 8. Open notes [Anything not captured above — career goals, life context that's relevant, structural concerns.] --- **Signature / acknowledgement:** Both manager and direct report sign / acknowledge the review (digitally is fine). The review is the source of truth for the conversation that happened.
Common mistakes
- Avoiding the harder conversation — it'll come up later anyway, with more damage
- Vague commitments ('do more proactive work') — impossible to grade next time
- Tying compensation to the calendar instead of outcomes — incentivises tenure not impact
- Forgetting manager commitments — reviews are bidirectional or they're surveillance
- Skipping the review entirely because 'we talk all the time' — talking and writing it down are different things
Related tool
Founder Weekly ReviewRelated hub
Startup Hiring